DUKE NUKEM FOREVER REVIEW WITHOUT PLAYING DUKE NUKEM FOREVER

DUKE NUKEM FOREVER REVIEW WITHOUT PLAYING DUKE NUKEM FOREVER - I have applied for review code. It might appear, could not. To be honest, I know what to say to me, because, let's face it: Duke Nukem Forever Duke Nukem Forever is not 2011 1997th For a game development cycle to more than a decade does not mean a decades worth of work and now when people talk about the demo - it's exactly what I would expect.

And how do you write a game with a legacy such as DNF, anyway? Take into account the story? You mention the list of things that had happened since announced? On the one hand, we can check play no game in history. On the other hand, is a story of how the expectations will build.

Duke Nukem Forever in 2011 collapsed FPS that 14 took years to talk about. It looks at the core of Duke Nukem and thrashes like a pastiche. It is crass and offensive, and is based on any successful franchise, without knowing why other bond that "it worked well for them." It is a mishmash of ideas and a self-indulgent joke pointless.

It has Halo weapon switching, a regenerating health bar, vehicle sections. Are these things or Duke Nukem game things? Things considered, because this is what to do now and games are Forever is a new game?

And this happened because of disorder. It's gone at once, it is again, back again. And can you tell by looking that no transmission code base or frame have inherited, they have inherited a name and a legacy and a simple marketing opportunity. They made a game from scratch in a very short time and called it Duke Nukem Forever and made it the lowest common denominator, that Duke Nukem Forever can be called.

Do I even want to play me as this super-alpha male, that everything revolves around? The guy, Leers in women and extensively watches porn and says all the dirty one-liners? Not anymore. I did when I was 11, maybe, but we have moved on. Times have moved on. I would argue that the Duke is no longer relevant, especially to people that this game is due for release: the people who are waiting for Duke Nukem Forever 1997th

Forever waiting for the people in 1997, this can only be a disappointment in every way. It is not as good a shooter, is really expected someone that this is the love for Half-Life or Call of Duty (if that's your thing) at the top? And it's not funny anymore? The odd joke could tap a smile, sure, but we have not all grown a bit? Is it still to be funny? Really?

For all those waiting for 2011's Forever - the younger players - it is an average console, which are ok, but could quickly forgotten. You can view it from there, from what it say on a level that this is not a classic. No one cares about them Duke Nukem Forever past the title, and for those waiting Forever, 2011, does the title not hold that much weight.

So we are going. I have not played it, but that's probably what I think of it. Of trailers and marketing and the hype of 1997, I think I have to keep a decent, what is and what it will not have. I could be wrong, of course, proved, but I doubt it. In the end, which is probably a new emphasis average FPS for young people, slapped with an old name to console, nothing more.

DUKE NUKEM FOREVER REVIEW WITHOUT PLAYING DUKE NUKEM FOREVER Source